uniftw wrote:Agreed completely.
It's nice that UNI and WSU were given all the chance in the world to "guarantee" a hot start and a bunch of wins up front but kind of sucks at the back end.
It also makes for a really tough start to the league schedule for teams trying to get off the mat. For instance, what if ISUb had been seen as a 7th place team instead of a 6th place team coming into the year? Do you think they'd be 4-0? Loyola has made a HUGE turnaround, but has little to show for it with a 2-2 record because they had to play WSU, UNI and UE in 3 of their first 4.
I'm not saying tough stretches won't just naturally occur when you're balancing the schedule out, but this was clearly deliberate. I'm sure creating late-season made-4-TV matchups is also important and leads to some decisions. Just seems a little overboard this year.
I've also always thought it was funny that a team would play both of their matchups with 2-3 other league teams before playing a couple of teams at all. This sort of stuff seems pretty innocuous. But what if WSU has an injury during the 2 weeks they play Drake and MSU twice while UNI has an injury during the two weeks they play WSU and ISUr twice? Suddenly it's a lot less innocuous to the potential outcome of the league race.