by Blers » September 19th, 2016, 12:02 pm
UE, I appreciate the sentiment, but I don't feel i'm getting ridiculed, it's just a disagreement. I like discussing about this stuff. I don't quite understand some people's Moser hate (though it seems to be not as bad as I perceived). I've just been more curious as to more detailed reasons why some think he should be gone.
Based on knocks:
Revolving door at post- He may use undersized players like Montel James, but he also had arguably the second best post player in the league, as well as turning Christian Thomas from a SF into a rock solid post threat. Furthermore i expect Aundre Jackson to be a load down low this year. And Cam Krutwig is a true center coming through next year. That said this is definitely a legitimate concern. Rajala and Kirby didn't provide much relief last year, and Ingram is serviceable down low but plays better at the 3.
Not utilizing talent- Devon Turk and Christian Thomas were both lower league talents who he maxed out. Turk in particular went from only a 3 pt threat to a complete player and defensive stud by his senior year. James also had measurable improvement throughout his two years
Conference play- I've mentioned the 6 pts = 4 losses for this season before but I also think it's important to mention that Doyle was injured for most of conference play during the CBI Year. He sprained his ankle badly at the start of the second half against Wichita State (we led by 5 at halftime); he tried to play through it but was shut down. Following his injury the team lost 6 of their next 8, but he was able to change the game plan somewhat and turned the keys over to Earl Peterson the team started to gel again and they finished conference play on a 5-3 run (Doyle came back in limited minutes for the last two games as well). Obviously any great team should be able to overcome, but Doyle was having a special season shooting 48% from the field and 42% from 3. I firmly believe if that team had a healthy Doyle they could have finished at least 12-6 in conference, and potentially earned an NIT bid with some quality non con wins over Texas Tech, Boise State, and Kent State.
My own knock is the offense can be hit or miss on any given game. Last year in particular the team had almost all of their guards shoot below their career percentages. There was an absurd number of open misses. I don't know what that's about, but i'm hoping the percentages even out this year; coach can't take the shots for them.
So if the ultimate knock on Moser is solely results based on his record without context (all of those excuses/caveats don't mean anything in the W/L record) than i'm totally satisfied and there's nothing i can do. It's ultimately a results based job and that's why so many fans were upset until their Arch Madness showing last year. I just think context is key and has earned him some slack in my mind (imagine if Tuttle or VanVleet went down for such extended periods over the last two years).
Sorry to steal what ultimately should have been a Bradley thread. You can also just copy and paste all of this stuff over if/when the Ramblers get selected to finish seventh in the next poll, ha!