Stay at 9?

Discuss the MVC hoops season here.

Stay at 9?

Postby Ali » April 2nd, 2013, 11:26 am

What are the chances that we stay at nine? No one seems to like any of the options out there to replace Creighton. I like the Dakotas and get ripped for that. Others like ORU, Denver, Belmont, whoever and all of those ideas are met with anger too.

Why not just stay at 9?
Ali
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 482
Joined: August 10th, 2010, 4:40 pm

Stay at 9?

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: Stay at 9?

Postby IllinoisState » April 2nd, 2013, 11:40 am

I wouldn't mind staying at nine for now until the dust settle with the Catholic 7/Big East. That should be about a year to 15 months and after that maybe we could try for an A-10 team like SLU, Dayton, or another good team (if either of the aforementioned teams aren't poached). However, in the long run, I don't like nine teams.
IllinoisState
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 604
Joined: March 22nd, 2013, 7:59 pm

Re: Stay at 9?

Postby isumvc1 » April 2nd, 2013, 11:41 am

Ali wrote:What are the chances that we stay at nine? No one seems to like any of the options out there to replace Creighton. I like the Dakotas and get ripped for that. Others like ORU, Denver, Belmont, whoever and all of those ideas are met with anger too.

Why not just stay at 9?


I could see staying at 9, but if we do then we run the risk of being picked apart (see Horizon League). They have not replaced Butler and now could be on the verge of losing several teams.

There aren't any "home run" teams to add to the MVC at the moment. However sitting idly by and watching (as we have in the past) other conferences expand is eventually going to hurt the MVC.

No matter who we add some fans are going to be really mad, while others will be fine, and yet others won't give a hoot. Not gonna please every fanbase. All we can do is sit and wait to see what the MVC presidents decide to do
isumvc1
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 2838
Joined: August 7th, 2010, 7:18 pm
Location: just west of the middle of nowhere

Re: Stay at 9?

Postby lurkingdog » April 2nd, 2013, 11:51 am

Just guessing, but I think those Dakota schools want to stay in together. With only one opening, they're out of luck.
lurkingdog
MVC Bench Warmer
MVC Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 44
Joined: October 9th, 2011, 7:28 pm

Re: Stay at 9?

Postby isumvc1 » April 2nd, 2013, 12:30 pm

lurkingdog wrote:Just guessing, but I think those Dakota schools want to stay in together. With only one opening, they're out of luck.


and don't forget they have home court advantage in their league tournament as well, there is no way they're giving that up. Not even for an offer to join the MVC.
isumvc1
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 2838
Joined: August 7th, 2010, 7:18 pm
Location: just west of the middle of nowhere

Re: Stay at 9?

Postby Shocktop42 » April 2nd, 2013, 12:31 pm

isumvc1 wrote:
lurkingdog wrote:Just guessing, but I think those Dakota schools want to stay in together. With only one opening, they're out of luck.


and don't forget they have home court advantage in their league tournament as well, there is no way they're giving that up. Not even for an offer to join the MVC.


i don't think that is true. they travel well regardless of location
Shocktop42
MVC Bench Warmer
MVC Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 30
Joined: December 15th, 2012, 3:52 pm

Re: Stay at 9?

Postby tribecalledquest » April 2nd, 2013, 1:43 pm

Non-conference scheduling gets REALLY tough if you only have 16 league games. I would be surprised if that happened.
tribecalledquest
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 2557
Joined: August 4th, 2010, 10:57 am

Re: Stay at 9?

Postby REDBIRD FAN 77 » April 2nd, 2013, 3:42 pm

Ali wrote:What are the chances that we stay at nine? No one seems to like any of the options out there to replace Creighton. I like the Dakotas and get ripped for that. Others like ORU, Denver, Belmont, whoever and all of those ideas are met with anger too.

Why not just stay at 9?


I like the Dakotas as well your not alone
REDBIRD FAN 77
MVC Recruit
MVC Recruit
 
Posts: 10
Joined: February 28th, 2012, 9:13 am

Re: Stay at 9?

Postby rlh04d » April 2nd, 2013, 4:10 pm

isumvc1 wrote:
Ali wrote:What are the chances that we stay at nine? No one seems to like any of the options out there to replace Creighton. I like the Dakotas and get ripped for that. Others like ORU, Denver, Belmont, whoever and all of those ideas are met with anger too.

Why not just stay at 9?


I could see staying at 9, but if we do then we run the risk of being picked apart (see Horizon League). They have not replaced Butler and now could be on the verge of losing several teams.

There aren't any "home run" teams to add to the MVC at the moment. However sitting idly by and watching (as we have in the past) other conferences expand is eventually going to hurt the MVC.

No matter who we add some fans are going to be really mad, while others will be fine, and yet others won't give a hoot. Not gonna please every fanbase. All we can do is sit and wait to see what the MVC presidents decide to do

The MVC runs the risk of being picked apart regardless of how many teams are in the conference.

The MVC's stability is a lack of better options. Any time a better option opens up it'll be picked apart. Doesn't matter if we have 9 or 10.
User avatar
rlh04d
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 2442
Joined: February 24th, 2012, 9:15 pm

Re: Stay at 9?

Postby pafan » April 2nd, 2013, 5:49 pm

rlh04d wrote:The MVC's stability is a lack of better options.


Give this man Gonzaga money. The only benefit of more teams is the likelihood that at no one time would the conference lose so many members that it is no longer viable.
sad Evansville alum
User avatar
pafan
MVC Valued Member
MVC Valued Member
 
Posts: 1747
Joined: August 10th, 2010, 9:03 am
Location: Evansville

Next

Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 125 guests