MoValley John wrote:Define "One of the best in the country."
JQH is a nice arena. Not great and not one of the best. It doesn't have locker rooms and a big plexiglass facade where an upper deck should be. Without a huge donation from JQH, MSU wouldn't even have the arena.
As far as operating budget, MSU may exceed only Evansville. The sanctimonious talk will continue.
I'm certainly not interested in being drawn into an MVJ gotcha, albeit very humorous, exchange...especially when the "quote" was amended from its original context and was about a subjective point of view.
The point is that MSU has, in fact, invested heavily in its program in recent years (as have most MVC programs) and the on-campus arena is the most visible representation of that fact.
The reality is that MVC programs will always have more financial limitations than Tennessee or Missouri or (insert most big six schools here), that includes Creighton, Wichita State and every other school without football money.
Those football money schools always have the capacity to pay head coaches and assistants more. They may choose not to, but they have the capacity. So lamenting Missouri State for not trying to match a $1.3 million offer to Cuonzo and citing that as an example of not investing in the program is silly. Could/should they pay more for a coach? Maybe. But they did recently win a regular season championship without doing so and have consistently been in the upper half of the league standings. I'd say MSU has generally received as good an ROI as any team in the league.
There is layer upon layer of complexity to this entire discussion, but in an arms race against folks with more resources, there always is a limit. Every school has to make decisions about what it invests and how. There is always a range of investment in any league and no league is exempted from schools that choose to invest fewer resources than others. I suppose that's my point. No matter what league you're in, there are those who won't invest as much - relatively speaking, of course.
As a group, MVC schools spend a very high percentage of their total athletic budgets on men's basketball.
If you take The Mid-Majority's Red Line numbers, MVC schools rank second (Horizon League) based on percentage of total budget spent on basketball (16.5 percent). They rank 11th in total spent (limitations, illustrated). The MVC schools are investing in their teams, but there's a limit.
One could argue that FCS football schools are the ones who really suffer as it relates to basketball investments (I would take that position), but that would take a lot more space.