Wufan wrote:RPI Forecast says:
ISUr 16-2
WSU 16-2
MSU 10-8
LUC 9-9
SIU 8-10
Drake 7-11
UNI 7-11
Bradley 6-12
UE 6-12
ISUb 5-13
Wufan, this seems completely reasonable, but do you think that MSU might perform a bit better and Evansville a bit worse?
Wufan wrote:RPI Forecast says:
ISUr 16-2
WSU 16-2
MSU 10-8
LUC 9-9
SIU 8-10
Drake 7-11
UNI 7-11
Bradley 6-12
UE 6-12
ISUb 5-13
WSpringsBird wrote:Wufan wrote:RPI Forecast says:
ISUr 16-2
WSU 16-2
MSU 10-8
LUC 9-9
SIU 8-10
Drake 7-11
UNI 7-11
Bradley 6-12
UE 6-12
ISUb 5-13
Wufan, this seems completely reasonable, but do you think that MSU might perform a bit better and Evansville a bit worse?
WSpringsBird wrote:Wufan wrote:RPI Forecast says:
ISUr 16-2
WSU 16-2
MSU 10-8
LUC 9-9
SIU 8-10
Drake 7-11
UNI 7-11
Bradley 6-12
UE 6-12
ISUb 5-13
Wufan, this seems completely reasonable, but do you think that MSU might perform a bit better and Evansville a bit worse?
WSpringsBird wrote:Wufan wrote:RPI Forecast says:
ISUr 16-2
WSU 16-2
MSU 10-8
LUC 9-9
SIU 8-10
Drake 7-11
UNI 7-11
Bradley 6-12
UE 6-12
ISUb 5-13
Wufan, this seems completely reasonable, but do you think that MSU might perform a bit better and Evansville a bit worse?
Wufan wrote:WSpringsBird wrote:Wufan wrote:RPI Forecast says:
ISUr 16-2
WSU 16-2
MSU 10-8
LUC 9-9
SIU 8-10
Drake 7-11
UNI 7-11
Bradley 6-12
UE 6-12
ISUb 5-13
Wufan, this seems completely reasonable, but do you think that MSU might perform a bit better and Evansville a bit worse?
Not my rankings. Those are per RPI Forecast.
Redbirdgrad wrote:I honestly don't see how Wichita doesn't go 17-1 this year.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests