BirdsEyeView wrote:Stickboy46 wrote:BirdsEyeView wrote:
Semantics. We just have a different philosophy.
I still don't see how fan support helps you maintain your level if GM is at Alabama right now alone.
You better hope your AD would have hired the next GM...and that has nothing to do with fan support.
Nothing can guarantee that you will get a home run hire but fan support (and the associated money) sure helps make a better hire. If you can't understand that, then well that's on you. I hope your admin doesn't have the same mindset and doesn't care about fan support.
Keep showing you examples where fan support and the associated money does not equate to success or continued success. See the Chicago Bears and University of Illinois both of which have lots of money lots of fan support and yet could not sustain success after losing a coach. The next hire was a bad hire and it's set the program or team back a few years no matter how good the fan support was and the money that came with it. Wichita State understood that and was willing to pay a lot more money to try and keep Gregg Marshall around.
Mostly coming from big donors.
Do you not get that?
Geez you are dense. You are arguing against a point that no one is making.
Me: Fan Support is important and one of the key components to success. It doesnt cure all and doesn't guarantee success but it puts you in a way better position.
You: look at these examples of places that failed with great fan support therefore fan support doesn't contribute to success and isn't necessary.
You keep arguing a flawed argument but you apparently aren't smart enough to see why it's flawed.