uniftw wrote:Stickboy46 wrote:
Does the MVC? WSU just accepted a move with baseball still playing ...
Does the MVC have a spine?
Point taken.
uniftw wrote:Stickboy46 wrote:
Does the MVC? WSU just accepted a move with baseball still playing ...
Does the MVC have a spine?
ValpoTX wrote:I really don't think that the HL would allow our teams to play in the conference tournament, in spite of giving them $30k-$50k to do so, as you suggest. For them, it is more of an issue to have an officially departing team representing your conference on their way out. We can agree to disagree here, but I support the approach that we are taking.
Pathfinder wrote:ValpoTX wrote:The exit fee would not be higher if the postseason ban rule wasn't in play. The conference already upped their exit fee from $100k to $500k when Butler left the conference on short notice. It is normal to take this approach. I can think of one school that left their conference with a 1-2 year notice during this realignment period, and their athletes played what amounted to lame duck seasons because of it. Anyone that tries to make the argument that it is unethical not to tell your conference that you are leaving as soon as you know about it, has no clue regarding college athletics.
The exit fee just amounts to a 'bitter ex's revenge' type of requirement by a conference, and is not used to compensate anything that damages the league. The league compensates with scheduling gaps just fine without any financial issues.
Of course the exit fee would be higher without the postseason ban. Why do you think conferences impose an exit fee? It's to discourage schools from leaving. Why do you think they impose a post-season ban on schools that are leaving? It's to discourage schools from leaving. You might say "no, it's because they don't want to send teams that are leaving on to represent the conference." Same thing. It raises the cost of leaving. The cost of changing leagues is the total cost of changing leagues. Don't want to cheat your athletes? Offer to pay an additional $30,000 or $50,000 or whatever is needed in exit fees for the right to participate in the conference tournament and represent the conference in the NCAAs. The Horizon's cheap and easily bought.
I think of conference exit fees less a bitter ex's revenge than as a pre-nup. You agreed to it, live with it. I don't know that Valpo's behavior is unethical, but someone use the phrase that others (meaning me) are being "holier than thou." No, it's the Valpo fans who started saying, "well, of course we're leaving, we just have to be duplicitous about it because the Horizon League has this "petty" rule. Yeah, rules always seem "petty" when you no longer want to live by them.
Valpo's making the move up. Good for Valpo. But at least own up to it. You're like the guy who's planning to break up with his mate for a better looking woman, but first wants one more night of great sex, then he'll tell her.
VU2014 wrote:
No offense but this whole discussion is pretty dumb... I'm not sure there is anything to "own up to"...
Yes we are doing what is best for our student athletes just as your University would very likely do the same if you were in this situation and I would not begrudge UNI for doing the same.
This whole conversation just seems a bit pointless and making a mountain out of a molehill about something. The HL offices and all the presidents have privately known we were leaving.
uniftw wrote:VU2014 wrote:
No offense but this whole discussion is pretty dumb... I'm not sure there is anything to "own up to"...
Yes we are doing what is best for our student athletes just as your University would very likely do the same if you were in this situation and I would not begrudge UNI for doing the same.
This whole conversation just seems a bit pointless and making a mountain out of a molehill about something. The HL offices and all the presidents have privately known we were leaving.
I'm not sure Pathfinder is a UNI fan.
5 posts. All about Valpo and/or UWM
uniftw wrote:VU2014 wrote:
No offense but this whole discussion is pretty dumb... I'm not sure there is anything to "own up to"...
Yes we are doing what is best for our student athletes just as your University would very likely do the same if you were in this situation and I would not begrudge UNI for doing the same.
This whole conversation just seems a bit pointless and making a mountain out of a molehill about something. The HL offices and all the presidents have privately known we were leaving.
I'm not sure Pathfinder is a UNI fan.
5 posts. All about Valpo and/or UWM
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 27 guests