Updating the Indiana State schedule a bit
Away
Indiana
Western Kentucky
Home
Air Force
Ball State
Wisconsin-Green Bay
Neutral
Auburn
Temple or Old Dominion
Clemson, Hofstra, Ohio, or Dayton
BEARZ77 wrote:MSU schedule will come down to the quality of the 2 buy road games they are still trying to solidify. Lots of names bandied but nothing confirmed, so it's pretty pessimistic . Don't think they get a D-2 team in Gulf Coast Tourney as the schedule wouldn't seem to allow that unless it would be in Florida. That Tourney is very pedestrian with some ok mids but no name teams. Right now the only bad game is Southern, but Hampton is also rumored at home; SDST,NDST,CSU, and WST are 5 solid mid major games . You have to have a little knowledge of the ongoing process when looking at scheduling as Wright State was 20-12 and a 114 RPI I think, and offered a H/H, while Auburn was 18-14, 108 and offered a low $$ buy game, so WST is a smarter pick. Auburn probably has a better chance at RPI potential with a SEC schedule, but Wright State has been a consistent program over a number of years and a H/H would be hard to turn down given how hard scheduling is. Been very down on our scheduling during Lusk era, and unless he hits on the 2 road buys, this will be another failure on his part. If he gets 2 quality games, it becomes acceptable, but not what we really needed.
VUGrad1314 wrote:That's really disappointing for an expected frontrunner in the conference. Given the expected quality of Missouri State's roster, Auburn probably would have agreed to play you. The good news is that Alize Johnson should beast against that nonconference slate, which might inflate his stats and boost his draft stock. Getting him to the NBA could help recruiting. Just wish he could showcase himself against better competition. That would really help his stock.
BEARZ77 wrote:That's last years format; now it may be this year's to, but I've not heard any mention of a home game for the Tourney, but I guess we'll see. I really don't know because there is zip info out there.
And names like Auburn don't mean squat in determining value. That's a fan thing.The score sheet the committee uses lists teams by rankings not by names. If you were talking a win against a top level basketball school, maybe some value to the name, but not a mid level SEC team. To me it's been clear for a number of years, the most important factor is top 50, then top 100 wins[ positively], and then sub 200, then sub 150 losses [negatively]. There would have been negligible value to a win vs Auburn as to Wright State last year because neither was a top 100. Now like I said, Auburn if good, has more potential for an RPI bump , but I'm just saying it's not such a big deal that Wright State made the schedule; besides that's assuming Auburn was even an option for us which we don't know. Just because they had an open date, didn't they opt out on a game with us a few years back??
As far as Lusk being gone if he doesn't meet expectations; I'll believe it when I see it. First expectations have not been clarified, they're pretty vague. "Challenge for a title, tourney worthy" My guess is 20 wins, a top 3 finish and an NIT or maybe even a step below and he's back. I've seen this play before.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Aces44 and 84 guests