underdawg wrote:Let me ask you a question---I know you hate Hinson. But seriously--If you don't think Cook, Bartley, Bol, Pippen, Fletcher, and (for God sakes) Sean Lloyd are good players I cannot even hold a discussion with you. They were so bad that they were all honored at the end of the season (either 2018 or Bol at end of 2017) and beginning of 2018 before he got hurt. You're also sleeping on Eric McGill my friend
As far as a buyout of Hinson--I too, after talking to some people, believe that Bell had an Idea he could go off on his own and do that. It didn't work-- by making it public, it gave any recruiting a black eye and it's a wonder, and a relief that roster players are still here after reading about it.
Look, if Tommy Bell wanted to replace Hinson--say next year after a bad OR good season--- he should have laid the scenario of what would happen if the Dawgs didn't make the Tournament---lay them out in Private NOT plaster it over every website in the US--the effect would have been the same (Hinson here or not here in 2019-20)
They aren't spectacular. Pretty average mid major recruits. Again. SIU was at the bottom of the conference in every statistical category. And I really dont understand your obsession with Bartley. He struggled to see the court on two really really bad SLU teams and was mediocre as a redshirt junior at SIU.
Lloyd, Bol, and Pippen were all questions to qualify who had lost any interest they had from other programs.
Armon Fletchers only other offer was from SIUe. Aaron Cooks other offers were from schools like Jacksonville State.
"Sleeping on Eric McGill"...,really? I am sure he is a nice kid, but his only two offers were from SEMO out of high school and SIU out of a JUCO.
Hinson recruiting can be boiled down to only go after players whose only offers are from low majors, only go after players with no other offers, JUCOs in springtime who might not qualify, or hope a coach has a kid good enough to play.
It's why in 6 years at SIU, the Salukis have empty 20 win seasons built on awful OOC schedules and the bottom half of the conference but are incapable of competing against any decent team they play or the upper half of the conference.
SIU finished 2nd. Yes. But statistically they looked like a Thursday night team. And the teams below them in the conference are much better at recruiting and bringing in talent while SIU brings back a roster that finished in the bottom half statistically of every category in the conference and the only recruit worth mentioned is a coaches kid who Hinson had no part in recruiting and might not qualify.