Blers wrote:I also have questioned if Muller would be on the hot seat...
-Always been above .500 but that includes 4 out of 6 seasons ending with 18 wins
-3 Championship game appearances... but all ended loses
-2 NIT.... I do agree they should have gotten a shot in 2017; but in fairness the margin of defeat against Wichita was hard to ignore, especially with a weak Valley (a 41 point loss and 20 point loss). Still though, the NIT is more than most Valley teams have made in recent years.
-Lots of player turnover
-Consistent questions of player character, it seems as though every year there's SOMETHING and the response always seems "meh" at best. It sucks too because i'm sure most of them are good kids and get lumped into the "jailbirds" stereotype.
But in fairness to all of that, most fans closer to the team know more. It's why most Rambler fans defended Porter when a lot of others were down on him; so i get there's something I may be missing. From the outside it seems like same Redbirds every year. Rich with talent; but also rich with off the court distractions. So my question is: why isn't it nearing a hot seat yet? It could be faith that the "just misses" and NIT's will turn into hits this year, or the alumni connection, or that people like how he represents the university through social media; I'm just curious what it is for Redbird fans!
And beyond that; at what point would fans start to get antsy? Hypothetically if Yarbrough plays and the team finishes with 18 wins this season and 2nd/3rd in conference would that have an effect?
EDIT: Just saw Redhawks post which makes some fair points, I didn't think about conference finishes; but would love to hear from others!
This is a really sensible post.
I'll address the Milik situation again briefly. As the situation progresses, it seems a lot was blown out of proportion. We will likely never know what actually happened that night. It is annoying that that things like this do come up. Hawkins before Milik, Knight before him with his issue. At this level, the reason players of Miliks talent aren't at a higher level is due to academic/off the court issues. P5's often don't have to take these risks. Muller has. I know ISU is not the only school in the MVC that has had legal issue but it has been an annual (or more) thing and it is annoying.
Regarding Muller on the hot seat, as some have suggested if Muller was on the hot seat, we better make sure whoever comes in will be better. I don't see that at this time. His inability to get over the hump at this juncture, I think a lot of Redbird fans are numb to. We have seen 6 losses on Sunday in STL in the last 10 years. The thing I like about Muller is that his teams have always been competitive against good teams. I compare Muller to where ISU was before he got here. I loved Porter Moser but he clearly wasn't ready to be a HC at the time. During Tim Jankovich's time, it was GREAT (sarcasm)! The Birds won 25+ games a year often but against the likes of Nichols State or Winston-Salem. When Muller was hired, his first commitment was scheduling. In his first year he got a H/H with Drexel, who had been nearing the T25, played @ No.5 Louisville, and started the H/H with Dayton. The next year, VCU, @NW, and a H/H with Depaul. Not to mention the game @ No.1 Kentucky, and against No.1 Maryland in the same year. These are games Jank would have never sniffed.
Muller is also consistently beating out some P5 teams for recruits. Again, something Jank never really did. Reputation set aside, the on-court trajectory of the program has been on the rise each year Muller has been here. The Redbirds are consistently recognized as an "under the radar" team in preseason media coverage.
Lastly, Muller has signed an extension. He quietly did so last August. The administration sees him as a commodity. As young as Muller is, I would love for this to be his last job. I am not naive enough to believe that, but it would be nice. Redbird fans are eager to make the NCAA Tournament, but many feel we are a Sweet 16 run away from Muller taking a bigger job. The contract extension he signed is through 2024. He's pulling in 600k when it's all said and done. Muller signed the contract in pencil though with an easy out. I believe if he takes another job he has to pay ISU 10k and schedule ISU in a H/H with his new team.
Short answer? His seat is in the freezer and hasn't started thawing yet.