BEARZ77 wrote:IWokeUpLikeThis wrote:Kip Dynamite wrote:Missouri State's AD was on the radio yesterday and was asked about this and he said he expects more movement in the near future. Thinks the SEC will add two more teams causing a ripple effect throughout again. Said his personal opinion for the Valley was to add a couple of new teams from the west to help Mo State out since we are now the outlier in the conference.
That would rule out NKU. Wonder who’s the other school MSU likes other than Murray St.
Only 3 schools <4 hr drive: ORU, UMKC, UALR.
It's funny and kind of sad that when I visit other Valley fans chat boards , that as soon as they have some success, there is a lot of talk about how they are too good for the Valley instead of recognizing that unless it's a move to a P-5 or BE , the Valley still represents the best option and still has excellent potential to be consistently a top 8 conference in basketball yearly. Chasing non-existent FB $$$ at the expense of the rest of your athletics especially the main money maker MBB, is well, UCONN like and I just can't see the A-10 as a better option for the privates all things considered.
Yeah, I noticed the ISU board has 4-5 people who post 864 times how the Valley is the SWAC (direct quote), ISU would be with Iowa St & Kansas St if not for the school’s poor leadership, and - my favorite - every ISU alum thinks so (because 4-5 posters spamming the same thing 864 times speak for everyone).
It’s incredible how little some of every school’s “my school deserves better than this league” crowd know about the sport, realignment, how it’s driven, how important being grandfathered into the power structure is, and how difficult upward mobility is to attain without demographics or sustainable success.