VUGrad1314 wrote:BCPanther wrote:I think we, focused exclusively on athletics, lose the point of how hard it's going to be for smaller universities in the Midwest to thrive going forward and that has to be at the forefront for the presidents, especially of the privates.
The population around us is getting older, the number of high school graduates is dropping and all of these institutions have to make sure they stay solvent. Picking off a few kids from Dallas and a few kids from Nashville and a few more from Kansas City can make a huge difference and it doesn't take many of them to make a difference.
One of our former presidents always said 'athletics and performing arts are the front porch of the university'. It's where people come and hopefully have a good enough time that they are curious enough to want to go look around inside the house next time.
That's all well and good I just think we'll do a better job of that if we added schools like UIC Milwaukee NKU St Thomas and Bellarmine: these are markets where most (if not all) MVC institutions could expect to have a fighting chance. Like it or not, most of our schools' reach is and will always be regional in nature and most kids want to go to school far enough away from home that they aren't under their parents' thumb but not so far away that they're in a completely different area of the country. I would venture to say that many more kids in Chicago Milwaukee Detroit Cincinnati Louisville and Minneapolis know how good Drake Bradley Valpo UNI Evansville and such are as schools and would be more apt to come here than kids from Texas and western Missouri. We wouldn't get more than a negligible handful from those areas. In places like Chicago and Milwaukee especially MVC schools could hope to give themselves a fighting chance to boost enrollment. Those are the schools I would be targeting if we're all about markets here.
As for the front porch argument I agree wholeheartedly and right now we just had a porch pirate steal our best package. It would be helpful if we could add some more nice packages (albeit not as nice as Loyola) like Murray State and NKU to keep Valley athletics competitive. Our pool of additions should be as follows:
If we want to get better athletically we should pick from: Murray State NKU Wright State and perhaps St Thomas Bellarmine Maybe Cleveland State or Oakland as well
If we want student recruitment adds we should pick from UIC Milwaukee UDM or even some of the schools I mentioned in the athletics portion but UIC and Milwaukee are by far and away the most potentially fruitful additions we could make if we want markets we could reliably tap into for students without busting our travel budgets and making it so we spend a good portion of the enrollment money we get from students from the far away places like Arlington traveling to play them. I wouldn't even so much look in KC and Arlington's direction unless I see firm commitments to athletics and a firm promise that Missouri State is staying. Otherwise I'd rather further regionalize the conference because that's where our students are going to come from like it or not. Even if you could guarantee me the former (Arlington and KC commitment to athletics) there's no way you could guarantee me the latter (Missouri State staying. Without Missouri State I'm just not that interested in having schools that far away when we could accomplish the same goals better with more geographically sensible additions.
RacerJoeD wrote:I wouldnt be shocked if its UIC as the fourth team
RacerJoeD wrote:I wouldnt be shocked if its UIC as the fourth team
Kyle_Saluki_17 wrote:It would seem that both Kansas City and UT Arlington would need to commit money into their programs to be able to join. I don't know what is standard for these types of moves, but I hope that we require both of them to spend above the median MVC budget, whatever that number is, to build their program to make sure that they are at least serious about basketball. Granted, money doesn't always equal results, but in general is a pretty good indicator of success. And of course, that they have commit to having nice facilities. This COULD turn into a good thing if they commit recourses like Loyola did.
And...Bring in Murray. Just do it.
Salukimadness86 wrote:Kyle_Saluki_17 wrote:It would seem that both Kansas City and UT Arlington would need to commit money into their programs to be able to join. I don't know what is standard for these types of moves, but I hope that we require both of them to spend above the median MVC budget, whatever that number is, to build their program to make sure that they are at least serious about basketball. Granted, money doesn't always equal results, but in general is a pretty good indicator of success. And of course, that they have commit to having nice facilities. This COULD turn into a good thing if they commit recourses like Loyola did.
And...Bring in Murray. Just do it.
Agree. Bring in Murray State, NKU, UIC and then another private. Perhaps Oakland?
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: sivert and 162 guests