bradley_townie wrote:BUFanatic wrote:
Ugh. The only people that like that creepy thing are the kids.
Also we’re still the Braves. We 100% botched the mascot thing. We didn’t have to change our name but we had to drop the Native American mascot. For some reason administration thought we needed a mascot right just now for some reason but considering the long history of the “Braves” everyone still associates it with that (or just the team absent a mascot which is what I grew up with).
Should have:
1) Reinstated the old mascot (which would never happen in this climate)
2) Stick with no mascot and “Braves”
3) Completely re brand and change its almost 100 year old nickname to match the new mascot.
Still… at least they nodded to the gargoyles on Bradley Hall. What does a lighthouse have to do with Valpo? (I went there a year and can confirm there is no lighthouse and you have to take a bus to get to the nearest body of water). Set up to be the dumbest thing since the dancing Tree of Stanford.
Don't forget the Bobcat that we had as a mascot for awhile before the Gargoyle. I must be one of the few people that don't actually mind the Gargoyle. There is a cool story behind it with Dave Snell and some of the architecture on campus, and like you said, kids like it. BU needs as many young people as they can get to replace all the Florida retirees.
Kaboom! is well-loved, and I say that as someone that was 100% opposed to the gargoyle concept.
It's one of the very few things Bradley has ever actually gotten right this side of 1960.
And Bradley has not used any Native imagery since at least 1993. In spite of this, because there was no separation or positive association in another way, on at least two separate occasions, Bradley was cited by the NCAA for fostering what was labeled once as a "hostile and abusive" association with the name. So an unrelated mascot had to be used to disassociate the word "Brave" from interpretations that could lead someone to make the connection to Native American culture.