sivert wrote:What makes the NCAA Tournament so lucrative is that everyone watches it.
The Men’s NCAA final had 20 times the viewership as the Big10 Men’s Final.
It is possible that the P? Push out the MidMajors. But would it last? Leaving our MMs will make the national viewership wane.
How I see it is people are suckers for the Cinderella, and that Cinderella story is so much sweeter when it is a Mid Major or a Low Major. I would even argue things such as the bracket challenge would wane as a result of a potential split of the power schools and the MidMajors. As for the split itself, we talk about this split between all of the power schools, but the forerunners are the SEC and the B10. While there is a possibility that these 2 conferences part with the NCAA, I highly doubt that the other conferences go with them. All decisions going foreword seem to be for football's sake. The SEC and the B10 seem to care less and less each year about their basketball.
Going into more logistical expertise. In terms of the power 6 (or Power 5 now) there are 69 schools. Seeing as March Madness is a field of 68, there would have to be major reform as to the tournament between the power conferences. Not only would this tournament be exceedingly boring, people would most likely continue to watch March Madness anyway. People tend to have 2 teams in the first place. Their "Power School" team and then their" real" team. Now a real team could be a power school, but typically this team is a mid or low major team.