AcesAces wrote:Evansville is bad. They are very bad.
3-7 with 2 more non-cons. Then it’s 19 straight MVC games. UE will be lucky to win 10 games this year. Ugh.
Clearly, UE failed in the portal and failed in player retention.
The weakening attendance and the moans and groans from the fans leaving early says it all. The program is not in a better place than it was 8 years ago.
Ragland is not delivering.
bradley_townie wrote:AcesAces wrote:Evansville is bad. They are very bad.
3-7 with 2 more non-cons. Then it’s 19 straight MVC games. UE will be lucky to win 10 games this year. Ugh.
Clearly, UE failed in the portal and failed in player retention.
The weakening attendance and the moans and groans from the fans leaving early says it all. The program is not in a better place than it was 8 years ago.
Ragland is not delivering.
How much time is left on Ragland's contract? Are fans calling for a change already? Not sure what Evansville's NIL situation is but that's almost as important these days as who is leading the team.
BCPanther wrote:The Chuck Bailey that's playing 9 minutes and scoring 3 points a game at Nevada?
That's the big loss?
ReZyNeZy wrote:
Calling me sensitive is a pot and kettle argument and there certainly wasn't any stretch of the truth to embolden previous claims. You have time and time again moaned and groaned about Valpo to the point of beating a dead horse. It seems to be the only team you take such intense issue with. You are the only that constaly has something to say avery time Valpo comes into the conversation and franky its annoying. You just have a superiority complex when it comes to the MVC. By your reasoning. Any add add this point is coming from a league you view as lesser. Hate to break this to you, but the AAC or the A-10 arent interesting in the valley and their condtituents arent either. And discounting an NIT runner up just because they were in the HL is a joke. The NIT is still a competative field against decent teams. I don't have an issue with anyone else, but you seem to just plain hate valpo despite how much you don't want to admit it. Also the issue with valpo being a declining institution is a good point, but once again. Yoy fail to take into account the multiple other valley schools who are also in states of decline. Mostly the constituents who are private, faith based institutions. So quit singling out one specific school when there are other schools with skeletons in the closet
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 26 guests