NCAA Seeding

Discuss the MVC hoops season here.

Re: NCAA Seeding

Postby Haha » March 11th, 2012, 9:17 pm

to the few complaints that mid majors always get matched with mid majors...

WSU is a (5) seed and 3 out of 4 (12) seeds are mid majors. Temple who next year will not be but this year is a mid major got matched up with the major. So not sure what you want done.

Thank goodness WSU isn't playing a major as a (5) seed. All that would have meant was that another non deserving major got in and a deserving mid didn't.
Haha
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 571
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 9:20 am

Re: NCAA Seeding

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: NCAA Seeding

Postby Ace Dad » March 11th, 2012, 9:25 pm

Shockerfan13 wrote:Personally I love the VCU matchup. I think these seniors and any other players that were on the team last year want another shot at them. Plus Marshall is typically pretty good at revenge games. Bring it on! Nothing too scary until Kentucky, and even they are beatable. It'll just take a VERY good game to do it. Gotta play the best at some point...let's get it on!



I wanted the Shockers to beat a team from the so called Power 6.
There is no difference between basketball and life. Give both your best and ignore the "fans" on the sideline.
User avatar
Ace Dad
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 1290
Joined: October 21st, 2010, 9:10 am

Re: NCAA Seeding

Postby bryce » March 11th, 2012, 9:48 pm

Good luck to the Shox and Blue Jays! Tough draws, don't like WSU going against VCU but they should win. Think Shox go to sweet sixteen but UK will be very tough to beat, but hoping they will(UL fan).
bryce
MVC Role Player
MVC Role Player
 
Posts: 160
Joined: November 12th, 2011, 8:17 pm

Re: NCAA Seeding

Postby kramer33 » March 11th, 2012, 10:09 pm

omahaben wrote:
MikeKennedyRulz wrote:The committee emphasized non conference strength of schedule apparently. Creightons non con sos was 189. Playing and beating wsu in the conference championship would have helped them immensely.


If that's the case, so be it. Gotta love how the committee picks and chooses a different thing to emphasize every couple of years, though. One year it's road wins, another it's non-conference schedules, another its overall RPI. I just wish they'd stay consistent or something so teams could be proactive rather than reactive.



Don't forget the "whenever needed" eye test excuse.
kramer33
MVC Walk On
MVC Walk On
 
Posts: 7
Joined: February 26th, 2011, 2:26 pm

Re: NCAA Seeding

Postby Jays26 » March 12th, 2012, 7:52 am

MikeKennedyRulz wrote:The committee emphasized non conference strength of schedule apparently. Creightons non con sos was 189. Playing and beating wsu in the conference championship would have helped them immensely.


Agreed....leave it to WSU to screw things up for the Jays!

:buddies:
Jays26
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 712
Joined: August 26th, 2010, 8:12 am
Location: Omaha

Re: NCAA Seeding

Postby beltwaybluejay » March 12th, 2012, 10:15 am

Having an early turney gives the bcs types more time to rationalize kicking a mid on down the road. I think its happened before and it will again. C U a #20 in this weeks coachs poll - where is the disconnect?
beltwaybluejay
MVC Recruit
MVC Recruit
 
Posts: 17
Joined: October 7th, 2011, 11:33 am

Re: NCAA Seeding

Postby CaliRdBrd » March 12th, 2012, 12:45 pm

beltwaybluejay wrote:Having an early turney gives the bcs types more time to rationalize kicking a mid on down the road. I think its happened before and it will again. C U a #20 in this weeks coachs poll - where is the disconnect?



Agreed. 28 wins in a top ten conference, MVC champs...That has to be worth at least a 7.

I'm actually disapopinted for you.

You shoulda laid down for the 'Birds. That way you would have avoided the dreaded 8-9 seed and we would have had three teams in the NCAA. Shame on you.
CaliRdBrd
MVC Role Player
MVC Role Player
 
Posts: 153
Joined: January 11th, 2012, 12:13 pm

Re: NCAA Seeding

Postby cpacmel » March 12th, 2012, 1:30 pm

MikeKennedyRulz wrote:The committee emphasized non conference strength of schedule apparently. Creightons non con sos was 189. Playing and beating wsu in the conference championship would have helped them immensely.


Because beating WSU in the conference championship would have changed Creighton's non conf sos? :huh:
cpacmel
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 526
Joined: August 5th, 2010, 11:47 am

Re: NCAA Seeding

Postby cpacmel » March 12th, 2012, 1:32 pm

omahaben wrote:If that's the case, so be it. Gotta love how the committee picks and chooses a different thing to emphasize every couple of years, though. One year it's road wins, another it's non-conference schedules, another its overall RPI. I just wish they'd stay consistent or something so teams could be proactive rather than reactive.


It's not that the committee picks and chooses, it's that each individual committee member can pick and choose what he (or she) feels is important.

And there is something very wrong with that. There needs to be more uniformity with the whole process.
cpacmel
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 526
Joined: August 5th, 2010, 11:47 am

Re: NCAA Seeding

Postby cpacmel » March 12th, 2012, 1:35 pm

valleychamp wrote: But, there is a different committee every year as well.


Committee members serve 5 year terms.

1-3 members rotate out ever year.
cpacmel
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 526
Joined: August 5th, 2010, 11:47 am

PreviousNext

Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AcesAces, Google [Bot] and 43 guests