TNMSUFAN wrote:valleychamp wrote:More like, who's not going to be good?
I think you will likely see SIU at the bottom, and probably Bradley right along with them. And even Bradley should be much better than they were last season. After that, I think that every other team is "good". I guarantee you that Creighton, Ill St, UNI, WSU, and maybe even Drake and Evansville all think they they can/will make the NCAA tournament this year.
I will give you CU, ISU(r) and UNI but after that there are a lot of questions marks...and for the record I think the Valley will be down some after those teams and it will be a mess in the standings 4-10.
Losing Gulley was a big blow for us but it is a position we have some experience with Pickens and Scheer able to play it. I really like our new guys just like everyone else likes theirs...we will find out in Nov.
I would say I have high expectations of at least Creighton, Wichita State, and UNI. Ill St. should be good as well, but I place reservations because of coaching and personnel changes (just like I feel the Saints should be good in the NFL, but may be hurt by the coaching and player suspensions).
Wichita State will be inexperienced, but they will be on a different level than the other MVC schools from a size and athleticism standpoint. I'm guessing their starting line-up will be Armstead (6'2), Wiggins (6'6), Early (6'8), Hall (6'8), and Orukpe (7'0). And all of those players are either above average or great athletically. They should be focused on defense and transition points, though the weakness so far has been half-court offense. But I don't think you can leave them out of the top 3 because of how nasty the combination of Orukpe + the long athletic perimeter players will be.
I think the Valley could be a legitimate 3-bid league next year. Of course, one of the problems is that no one in the MVC has a decent OOC schedule from an RPI standpoint (think Long Beach State), so they have to win their OOC games against the few good teams to have a chance.