SHOXMVC wrote:Jays26 wrote:Nice win for the Shockers on the road and the Valley. Tough game to watch, pretty ugly, first one to 50 wins!
Time will tell if this was a quality win or not.
The time is 1:12 in my world...trust me, it's a quality win.

SHOXMVC wrote:Jays26 wrote:Nice win for the Shockers on the road and the Valley. Tough game to watch, pretty ugly, first one to 50 wins!
Time will tell if this was a quality win or not.
The time is 1:12 in my world...trust me, it's a quality win.
DoubleJayAlum wrote:bigdawg wrote:That game was very reminiscent of SIU of old.
So, after years of WSU fans making fun of Ugly Ball, Marshall has now adopted it?
shoxrox wrote:I think you should take up your issue with those 1 or 2 WSU fans that made those comments about "Ugly Ball", rather than paint the WSU fanbase with broad strokes.
DoubleJayAlum wrote:So, after years of WSU fans making fun of Ugly Ball, Marshall has now adopted it?
DoubleJayAlum wrote: I just thought it was amusing that for all of the complaining that certain WSU posters have done over the years about SIU and more recently, UNi and Evansville, Marshall may now be implementing the same style.
CaseyGarrisonforPrez wrote:I also am rooting for the Shocks but realistically I think the WSU rolodex of excuses will be on full display in about seven hours. They aren't athletic enough to compete with those VCU thoroughbreds unfortunately. But maybe Double G will outcoach Shaka.
DoubleJayAlum wrote:I was talking about this quote:DoubleJayAlum wrote: I just thought it was amusing that for all of the complaining that certain WSU posters have done over the years about SIU and more recently, UNi and Evansville, Marshall may now be implementing the same style.
Aargh wrote:SIU's "Ugly Ball" included holding the ball for 30 seconds before attempting to score.
WSU is more inclined to play Ugly Ball on the defensive end, and not on the offensive end.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 28 guests