shoxrox wrote:I think it's more likely that Creighton wins by 20-25 than by 10-15.
Since you cast the first stone....I hope you dont gamble as well.
shoxrox wrote:I think it's more likely that Creighton wins by 20-25 than by 10-15.
Aces1982 wrote:shoxrox wrote:I think it's more likely that Creighton wins by 20-25 than by 10-15.
Since you cast the first stone....I hope you dont gamble as well.
shoxrox wrote:MoValley John wrote:Once again, Colt didn't start scoring until garbage time.
That point has been brought up a lot and it seems like it holds true more times than not. There's not much pressure to score when you're down 15-20 points. Defenses naturally lose intensity in those situations and since the result has been decided, the pressure to make shots decreases dramatically.
Colt Ryan is a pretty good shooter but it seems like the majority of the box scores I read he's scoring a lot after games have been decided. Add this one to the list.
MoValley John wrote:Colt had what, four or six points at the break?
shoxrox wrote:Aces1982 wrote:shoxrox wrote:I think it's more likely that Creighton wins by 20-25 than by 10-15.
Since you cast the first stone....I hope you dont gamble as well.
I didn't cast the first stone. Somebody else already called you out.
But any who, how many did Creighton end up winning by? 17? I'd call it a push. Certainly closer than your outlandish prediction.
You are what you are. 7-6. (6-6 against D-1).
You can continue to sit on here and defend every post that tarnishes Evansville's good name in this thread after their close 17-point loss. Hope is alive. Have at it.
Aces1982 wrote:shoxrox wrote:Aces1982 wrote:
Since you cast the first stone....I hope you dont gamble as well.
I didn't cast the first stone. Somebody else already called you out.
But any who, how many did Creighton end up winning by? 17? I'd call it a push. Certainly closer than your outlandish prediction.
You are what you are. 7-6. (6-6 against D-1).
You can continue to sit on here and defend every post that tarnishes Evansville's good name in this thread after their close 17-point loss. Hope is alive. Have at it.
Baller ,it was a loss. They are 0-1. All 8 other MVC teams are going to get beat at Creighton.
MoValley John wrote:Aces1982 wrote:shoxrox wrote:
I didn't cast the first stone. Somebody else already called you out.
But any who, how many did Creighton end up winning by? 17? I'd call it a push. Certainly closer than your outlandish prediction.
You are what you are. 7-6. (6-6 against D-1).
You can continue to sit on here and defend every post that tarnishes Evansville's good name in this thread after their close 17-point loss. Hope is alive. Have at it.
Baller ,it was a loss. They are 0-1. All 8 other MVC teams are going to get beat at Creighton.
First off, he's not baller. Secondly, Creighton will lose at home to a Valley team. Maybe Either ISU or WSU. Lastly, Creighton won by 17, but it really wasn't that close. Evansville is not very good and their record reflects as much. No moral victories tonight.
shoxrox wrote:MoValley John wrote:Once again, Colt didn't start scoring until garbage time.
That point has been brought up a lot and it seems like it holds true more times than not. There's not much pressure to score when you're down 15-20 points. Defenses naturally lose intensity in those situations and since the result has been decided, the pressure to make shots decreases dramatically.
Colt Ryan is a pretty good shooter but it seems like the majority of the box scores I read he's scoring a lot after games have been decided. Add this one to the list.
MoValley John wrote:So baller posts as both baller and shoxrox on Shockernet? And how much do you want to bet on the 4-5 game? Right now, you guys are better than MSU and maybe SIU. Drake is a push.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 39 guests