ictjay wrote:WuDrWu wrote:ictjay wrote:Why the dismay with WSU after 1 lopsided win?
I started the season thinking that WSU's inside game would be the difference over the course of 18 games. It still might, but I don't like the look of the chemistry of this team and I do of some others. I also am not on the "everyone said losing Hannah would be a problem" bandwaggon, as I think Toure' is more than serviceable and Ragland will be fine over time even if DWill struggles.
I just don't see the same chemistry that I've seen with the SIU great teams, or Drake 3 years ago or UNI and I think that's what it takes to be the best.
Plus the Valley is so darned TOUGH!!!!
Chemistry is BIG. It was Creightons downfall last year imho.
I agree. I think if CU had won the Michigan game they would have been fine. After the Dayton and Michigan losses (I think that should have won both) they started question themselves - and with Xavier, GM and NM on the non-conference schedule that can't happen if you want to be successful and it snowballed on them and then the implosion.