Several posters have commented this year that an official's call or non-call directly influenced the outcome of a MVC game.
The KU Jayhawks probably won a game on the road last night because the officials screwed up:
http://voices.kansascity.com/entries/th ... owa-state/
I am old school and believe that we ought to leave the current system alone and if an official makes a mistake that impacts a game's outcome, let the conference and the supervising officials deal with it.
Are we at the point with replays that anyone believes that a supervising official at the table, or in the booth, or at NCAA headquarters should have the authority to overrule official miscues made in the last 60 seconds if the opposing coach calls for a review. For example, last night, if the ISU coach challenged the call, an official outside the officiating 3 man crew makes the call before the game goes on. If the challenge is not upheld, the coach who made the challenge loses 3 timeouts in his next game.
Again, I am not for changing anything, but officiating seems to be getting more attention nowadays.