ahunte1 wrote:Thanks. Appreciate it.
That's it! We can't join. There isn't a centralized streaming system!
Seriously, though. It's kind of amusing that the Horizon League has, seemingly, a leg up with regard to streaming.
ahunte1 wrote:Thanks. Appreciate it.
GoRamblers wrote:ahunte1 wrote:Thanks. Appreciate it.
That's it! We can't join. There isn't a centralized streaming system!
Seriously, though. It's kind of amusing that the Horizon League has, seemingly, a leg up with regard to streaming.
valleychamp wrote:They have a "leg up" in streaming because Horizon games aren't on TV. Anyone can stream all of their games for free if they choose to do so, but its going to come about at the expense of being on TV, or because nobody will put you on TV.
GoRamblers wrote:valleychamp wrote:They have a "leg up" in streaming because Horizon games aren't on TV. Anyone can stream all of their games for free if they choose to do so, but its going to come about at the expense of being on TV, or because nobody will put you on TV.
What is the current TV deal for the MVC?
unipanther99 wrote:GoRamblers wrote:valleychamp wrote:They have a "leg up" in streaming because Horizon games aren't on TV. Anyone can stream all of their games for free if they choose to do so, but its going to come about at the expense of being on TV, or because nobody will put you on TV.
What is the current TV deal for the MVC?
They use a VHS camcorder from 1994, run it through about 50 splitters, hire a few local drunks to call the games, and somehow it occasionally ends up on Fox Sports Midwest, and occasionally some of the other local Fox Sports outlets if there isn't a professional hockey or basketball game on (which there almost always is).
GoRamblers wrote:ahunte1 wrote:Thanks. Appreciate it.
That's it! We can't join. There isn't a centralized streaming system!
Seriously, though. It's kind of amusing that the Horizon League has, seemingly, a leg up with regard to streaming.
ACECARD wrote:unipanther99 wrote:GoRamblers wrote:What is the current TV deal for the MVC?
They use a VHS camcorder from 1994, run it through about 50 splitters, hire a few local drunks to call the games, and somehow it occasionally ends up on Fox Sports Midwest, and occasionally some of the other local Fox Sports outlets if there isn't a professional hockey or basketball game on (which there almost always is).
LOL, actually not far from the truth.
Mikovio wrote:I don't think it takes them necessarily 10 years. They could easily fire Moser and throw seven figures at the next Andy Enfield or whoever and be relevant in 3-4 years. Why admit Belmont when you can admit the school who can hire away the Belmont coach?
The way I see it, the MVC had two reasonable choices:
1. Pick a school with a team that's good now but with no reasonable plan to recover if it hits hard times. Murray State is good now, but it's on its second coach in 3 years. What if after another good year its coach leaves for a Mountain West school that could double his salary? It would promote from within again, which might work or it might not. Ask SIU about that.
2. Pick a school with the resources and will to become good in the future. Loyola and Denver can hire away the best and brightest, and pay them enough so they don't jump when they taste success. Even if a BCS school gives them money they can't match, they would have a better applicant pool than Murray or ORU.
The MVC needs schools that can and will invest in order to grow, and fewer schools that hire BCS assistants with no coaching experience and hope for the best.
Endowment of candidates
UMKC $1.2b (system-wide)
Loyola $430m
Denver $380m
Creighton $375m
Bradley $237m
WSU $199m
UW-M $184m
UIC $181m
Drake $158m
Valpo $141m
Evansville $118m
SIU $100m
ISU Red $88m
Belmont $76m
ISU Blue $75m
UNI $66m
MSU $61m
Oral Roberts $38m
Murray State $33m
valleychamp wrote:Good lord. Everyone needs to settle down, and stop being outraged just for the sake of being outraged. You know damn well not a single one of you would have been "happy" with whomever got chosen. The fact is, there wasn't a real shiny school out there for the Valley to grab.
m-v-c wrote:rlh04d wrote:ahunte1 wrote:rih - Just beat us twice by 25 and win the tourney and you've got nothing to worry about
I hope you guys get good enough in the future to enjoy the misery that is Arch Madness.
You mean the misery of a conference tournament that a league like the Pac-12 would be jealous of? Nothing miserable about it.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests