uniftw wrote:As for the NCAA's UNLV was honestly very similar to this years Pitt's team I'd bet. Their "pom numbers" are inflated from the Big East. WSU boat raced them...we needed Ali to come though and he did.
It's tough to say...I'm probably biased (And will be blasted as such by WSU fans) so I'd pick UNI.
Well ... no. KenPom's numbers are specifically designed to not be inflated by conferences. That would be RPI you're thinking of.
Why would we blast you? Obviously you're biased. We are too. The only difference is, again, your entire post was gut feelings without any quantitative evidence that can really be compared between different seasons. If you think "WSU boat raced them" is an indicator that Pittsburgh is bad, then fine ... all that time you spent recapping your MVC tournament was worthless, because obviously you beating them that bad means they were bad teams to start with, so boat racing them isn't impressive. "Your defense clearly wasn't that good; they were just bad."
As for your points about the Michigan State game ... we could say the same about Louisville. We lost by four and Malcolm Armstead had possibly the worst offensive game of his career on 1-10 shooting with 2 total points. And we can say the exact same thing about fouls -- Louisville's press never worked against us until Armstead was put into foul trouble. Still, we only trailed for six minutes the entire game. Only difference is? Our loss was for a chance to go to the national championship game, and yours was for a shot at the Elite 8.
You can have your opinion, and we can have ours. Only difference is I gave about five examples of quantitative evidence that we were the better team, and you gave none. So the numbers are on our side until you can prove otherwise
Some more stats: WSU's scoring margin in 2012-13 was 8.7, UNI's in 2009-10 was 8.2. As established earlier, WSU played the tougher schedule, as well.