CBB_Fan wrote:It isn't just about the Final Four, it is about postseason success in general. Creighton may have danced 18 or so odd times, but they've still never won two games in a row in the tournament. Wichita State has done that and more (and not only once or under one coach, but several times in several different decades). While they've never been consistently good over a long period of time they've shown an ability to be great. Creighton simply hasn't, even though they've shown that in the Valley they could consistently win the tournament or get an at-large bid.
Creighton's invite to the "big boys table" was predominantly based around several factors, and those factors don't come down to a difference of program building between the two schools:
1. Being a Catholic private school
2. The construction of a large arena by the city (Intrust was a mistake for basketball in that it should have been built much bigger)
3. Filling that arena with low ticket prices and an untapped basketball market, with little power conference competition
While Creighton still needed to be good to get invited, it is incorrect to say that the difference between Creighton switching conferences and Wichita State staying in the MVC is that Creighton has a better program. The main differences were religion, being a private school, and having a perfect environment to boast large crowd numbers. None of that comes down to a difference in the basketball programs.
Let's be honest. If there is any reason other than the quality of the basketball programs that caused CU to be picked over WSU, it is the fact that WSU's academics are nowhere near the quality of the Big East schools, while Creighton's are right in line.
If WSU wants a legit chance at the next round of Big East expansion, they should take steps to improve their academic reputation so that other Big East schools no longer view them as a diploma mill.