FearDaTrees wrote:The Sycamores certainly had opportunities to get it done and didn't. Both teams played really good defense for pretty much the entire game but we didn't really have an answer for Early down low. Myself, along with just about everybody in the HC last night, thought that Cleanthony and one with about a minute left was definitely a charge. Odum was set for a full second before Early plowed into him. If that is called a charge, we get the ball back with 1 min to go and a chance to take the lead. Missing the front end of one and one's late in the 2nd half will get you every time. Good game, Shox. See you at the Arch.
shocktheheart wrote:FearDaTrees wrote:The Sycamores certainly had opportunities to get it done and didn't. Both teams played really good defense for pretty much the entire game but we didn't really have an answer for Early down low. Myself, along with just about everybody in the HC last night, thought that Cleanthony and one with about a minute left was definitely a charge. Odum was set for a full second before Early plowed into him. If that is called a charge, we get the ball back with 1 min to go and a chance to take the lead. Missing the front end of one and one's late in the 2nd half will get you every time. Good game, Shox. See you at the Arch.
Charged call differently this year. Secondary defender has to be completely set before the offensive player starts his upward motion. It was close, but if you take a look at the replay, Odum wasn't completely set yet.
FearDaTrees wrote:The Sycamores certainly had opportunities to get it done and didn't. Both teams played really good defense for pretty much the entire game but we didn't really have an answer for Early down low. Myself, along with just about everybody in the HC last night, thought that Cleanthony and one with about a minute left was definitely a charge. Odum was set for a full second before Early plowed into him. If that is called a charge, we get the ball back with 1 min to go and a chance to take the lead. Missing the front end of one and one's late in the 2nd half will get you every time. Good game, Shox. See you at the Arch.
FearDaTrees wrote:shocktheheart wrote:FearDaTrees wrote:The Sycamores certainly had opportunities to get it done and didn't. Both teams played really good defense for pretty much the entire game but we didn't really have an answer for Early down low. Myself, along with just about everybody in the HC last night, thought that Cleanthony and one with about a minute left was definitely a charge. Odum was set for a full second before Early plowed into him. If that is called a charge, we get the ball back with 1 min to go and a chance to take the lead. Missing the front end of one and one's late in the 2nd half will get you every time. Good game, Shox. See you at the Arch.
Charged call differently this year. Secondary defender has to be completely set before the offensive player starts his upward motion. It was close, but if you take a look at the replay, Odum wasn't completely set yet.
I guess we're looking at different replays...
KC MVC FAN wrote:I don't pretend to be a coach. Couldn't start to diagram a play. But, watching last night's game I offer my thoughts on both WSU and INSU offenses.
WSU: one, two or three players always moving: to a screener position, cutting, breaking to the goal, positioning for a rebound, etc. Motion, motion, motion.
INSU: No motion, no motion, no motion. Very little pick and roll, few effective screens, no sharp cutters, to many long shots with no one in position to rebound, no inside game--smothered by WSU big guys. INSU played the arc too much---Odum was effective when he drove but even then he was dribbling into a seam rather cutting into a open slot created by a pick, a screen, or receiving a good pass. It seemed the 3 INSU guards/forward set the pivot foot, stayed in that position, then did a series of head, foot step, ball fakes/feints 2 or 3 time, then pass to another F or G and he would go through the same set of fakes or feints. May even happened a third or fourth in several possessions. KILLED THE MOTION--followed by a last second long shot! All WSU had to do was play straight up face to face defense.
Cdizzle wrote:KC MVC FAN wrote:I don't pretend to be a coach. Couldn't start to diagram a play. But, watching last night's game I offer my thoughts on both WSU and INSU offenses.
WSU: one, two or three players always moving: to a screener position, cutting, breaking to the goal, positioning for a rebound, etc. Motion, motion, motion.
INSU: No motion, no motion, no motion. Very little pick and roll, few effective screens, no sharp cutters, to many long shots with no one in position to rebound, no inside game--smothered by WSU big guys. INSU played the arc too much---Odum was effective when he drove but even then he was dribbling into a seam rather cutting into a open slot created by a pick, a screen, or receiving a good pass. It seemed the 3 INSU guards/forward set the pivot foot, stayed in that position, then did a series of head, foot step, ball fakes/feints 2 or 3 time, then pass to another F or G and he would go through the same set of fakes or feints. May even happened a third or fourth in several possessions. KILLED THE MOTION--followed by a last second long shot! All WSU had to do was play straight up face to face defense.
What game were you watching? That was the worst (2nd maybe to St. Louis?) WSU's offense has looked all year. Full credit to InSU for making the WSU offense look that terrible. I'm OK with InSU reviewing that game tape in preparation for a possible 3rd matchup in March. I would very much appreciate if they burned all the other copies and did not share with other schools.
KC MVC FAN wrote:I gave you my Dick Vitale verbal analysis. Where is your's---please, no RPI, no SOS crap some of you guys spew.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 114 guests