Rollbird5 wrote:Cdizzle wrote:Rollbird5 wrote:Sorry guys how dare I disagree with the almighty king of the basketball world wichita state shockers fan base. It is different playing 4-5 games when teams haven't seen you as much but playing 18+ games against those teams the stats may differ, they may not we'll never know. As for some guys I would put ahead of Baker: Caris LaVert, Wayne Selden, Malcolm Brogden, Marcus Foster. I would put Baker ahead of Harrison, I think Harrison's are overrated. So I'd have Baker at least 5th IMO. I think he's an excellent player all I've said is that he is not #2 in the nation like sportingnews said IMO
Nothing wrong with disagreeing, just trying to figure out on what you were basing your judgment. Here's a side-by-side comparison of the players you list. I think it's pretty clear that Selden is a cut below the other 4. His raw numbers, efficiencies, and peripheral stats are all considerably lower.
http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/compar ... cus-foster
After that, I would agree that LaVert, Brogdon, Foster and Baker make a good list, regardless of order. Baker has some efficiency and peripheral stat advantages in some places, but I could buy those equalizing against more consistent top-notch competition.
I like that website never seen it definitely good for comparing players. When I compare I do look at stats some but I feel like stats can be misleading so I base my comparisons off seeing them play who they play and how they react to different situations as my main criteria.
That's where it gets a little weird because Baker should pass the eye test. He's 6-3 or 6-4 and as strong as any 2 guard in the nation. He has a lightning quick release, good handles, gets to the basket, rebounds, takes care of the ball, has good vision, and is a good defender. He passes my eye test. I guess I'd like to see a little more athleticism.
What weaknesses do you see that make you think he's not a top 5 or 10 SG? If your argument is that he's not #2 but he's in your top 8, then I don't have an argument...it's too subjective at that level.