Rule changes coming...maybe?

Discuss the MVC hoops season here.

Rule changes coming...maybe?

Postby uniftw » February 6th, 2015, 1:24 pm

They are being tested in the NIT this year.

-Shot clock to 30 seconds (woman's game is currently at 30 seconds)
-Restricted circle extending to 4' from 3 ft


http://www.ncaa.com/news/basketball-men/article/2015-02-06/experimental-rules-be-used-during-2015-nit-include-30-second

Men’s basketball teams selected to play in the 2015 Postseason NIT will compete using experimental rules, including a 30-second shot clock and a four-foot restricted-area arc. The rules will be in effect for all 31 games of the tournament.

The shot clock in men’s basketball is now 35 seconds, where it has remained since the 1993-94 season, and the restricted-area arc extends three feet from the center of the basket.

The shot clock is being reduced by five seconds in the 32-team NIT field to see what effect it will have on pace of play and scoring. The restricted-area arc is being extended a foot to determine whether that change reduces the number of collisions under the basket.

The restricted-area arc became a men’s basketball rule in the 2011-12 season. A secondary defender cannot establish initial legal guarding position in the restricted area for the purpose of drawing a charge while defending a player who is in control of the ball -- either dribbling or shooting -- or who has released a pass or shot. When contact occurs within this restricted area under these circumstances, a blocking foul should be called unless the contact is a flagrant foul.

The NCAA Men’s Basketball Rules Committee, which meets May 13-15 in Indianapolis, will collect the information and compare it to data from the 31 games played in the 2013 Postseason NIT, when the block/charge guarding rules were the same as they will be for the 2015 event. Committee members hope to have some initial findings by the 2015 Men’s Final Four, which will be played April 4-6 in Indianapolis.

Coaches who participate in the NIT will be surveyed about how they prepared and practiced to compete using the experimental rules.

The committee will examine the data and discuss possible rules changes and identify ways to improve college basketball.

“The committee discussed both of these potential rule changes during its May 2014 meeting, knowing that the May 2015 meeting would be the committee’s next opportunity to make a change to either of these rules,” said Rick Byrd, head men’s basketball coach at Belmont and chair of the NCAA Men’s Basketball Rules Committee.

“Although the committee will discuss a number of potential rules changes at the meeting, having specific data on these two rules should help the committee make a decision about whether such potential rule changes might further improve the flow and competitiveness of college basketball,” Byrd said.

“The NIT has always been recognized as a pioneer event in postseason college basketball and at this key time in college basketball’s history and evolution, it is fitting that the NIT can help provide valuable analysis on the potential effect of these experimental rules changes,” said the NCAA’s Vice President of Men’s Basketball Championships Dan Gavitt. “We think this is an important initiative for the NIT to take a leadership role for the future benefit of our game.”

The NIT Committee is in full support of the utilization of experimental rules. The NIT field and bracket are announced on March 15 at 8:30 p.m. on ESPNU. The tournament will be broadcast in its entirety on ESPN networks culminating with the championship game at Madison Square Garden on April 2.
uniftw
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: January 20th, 2011, 9:01 pm

Rule changes coming...maybe?

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: Rule changes coming...maybe?

Postby unipanther99 » February 6th, 2015, 2:18 pm

Leave the game alone. I like it as is.
User avatar
unipanther99
MVCfans.com
MVCfans.com
 
Posts: 1722
Joined: August 4th, 2010, 3:18 pm
Location: Iowa City

Re: Rule changes coming...maybe?

Postby hot nuts » February 6th, 2015, 2:24 pm

I think these minor tweaks would be good for game flow. They are not major fundamental changes, I think 30 seconds is sufficient time for teams to work their offensive sets without it being just to work the clock down.
hot nuts
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 636
Joined: August 5th, 2010, 8:54 am

Re: Rule changes coming...maybe?

Postby Play Angry » February 6th, 2015, 2:40 pm

Extending the circle and reducing the shot clock are fine tweaks. More possessions = more points, which is the primary goal. Extending the circle will ever so slightly help with the conversion rates on offense, which has been in decline for years with the increasingly permitted physicality.

At some point, though, they have to re-emphasize something similar to freedom of movement or offensive efficiency will continue to decline after a one-year spike.
Play Angry
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 814
Joined: October 17th, 2013, 12:06 pm

Re: Rule changes coming...maybe?

Postby uniftw » February 6th, 2015, 4:11 pm

Will it increase points/possessions though?

How many teams are actually taking a significant % of their possessions down to less than 5 on the shot clock?

I'm sure one of the stat sites has to track something like that.
uniftw
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: January 20th, 2011, 9:01 pm

Re: Rule changes coming...maybe?

Postby Play Angry » February 6th, 2015, 4:20 pm

It will certainly speed up tempo and increase possessions. How much is up for debate, but shortening the max possession time by 14% will have an impact.

Teams like UNI and WSU who routinely force the opposition to use most of the shot clock (~25+ seconds now) will see those same teams taking shots with roughly the same average time remaining on the shot clock (~10 seconds).
Play Angry
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 814
Joined: October 17th, 2013, 12:06 pm

Re: Rule changes coming...maybe?

Postby unipanther99 » February 6th, 2015, 4:33 pm

Play Angry wrote:It will certainly speed up tempo and increase possessions. How much is up for debate, but shortening the max possession time by 14% will have an impact.

Teams like UNI and WSU who routinely force the opposition to use most of the shot clock (~25+ seconds now) will see those same teams taking shots with roughly the same average time remaining on the shot clock (~10 seconds).


But won't that also result in poorer shot selection for those games, driving down percentages, and thus negating any meaningful increase in offensive output?
User avatar
unipanther99
MVCfans.com
MVCfans.com
 
Posts: 1722
Joined: August 4th, 2010, 3:18 pm
Location: Iowa City

Re: Rule changes coming...maybe?

Postby Play Angry » February 6th, 2015, 4:38 pm

unipanther99 wrote:
Play Angry wrote:It will certainly speed up tempo and increase possessions. How much is up for debate, but shortening the max possession time by 14% will have an impact.

Teams like UNI and WSU who routinely force the opposition to use most of the shot clock (~25+ seconds now) will see those same teams taking shots with roughly the same average time remaining on the shot clock (~10 seconds).


But won't that also result in poorer shot selection for those games, driving down percentages, and thus negating any meaningful increase in offensive output?


If every slow tempo team played extended pressure defense that prevented a team from getting into its set until significant time elapsed, then yes. Most (including WSU and UNI) don't. They frustrate the effectiveness of the set in the half court.

The efficiency stats on offense may dip a tiny bit but I'm guessing that small effect would be negated by the extension of the charge circle.

Still gotta clean up the approach to foul whistles eventually though.
Play Angry
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 814
Joined: October 17th, 2013, 12:06 pm

Re: Rule changes coming...maybe?

Postby Rambler63 » February 6th, 2015, 4:52 pm

I really hate the idea of doing it in the NIT. Either go with the new rules from the start of the season or don't-- even if it's "only" the NIT, it still means something to the participating teams, and changing the rules at the end of the season is unfair. The NCAA using the NIT as a petri dish even further diminishes a good tournament that gives some developmental benefits and recognition to some also-ran teams, and helps them develop their fanbases.
User avatar
Rambler63
MVC starter
MVC starter
 
Posts: 382
Joined: May 4th, 2013, 3:25 pm
Location: Edgewater

Re: Rule changes coming...maybe?

Postby TheAsianSensation » February 6th, 2015, 8:14 pm

I prefer 30. The offense will be slightly worse, but I think that's negligible. 24 is too short, but 30 is enough time to run your stuff. And this will create just a few more possessions per game. Makes sense.
http://bracketball.blogspot.com/ A national version of the world-famous TAS Bracketology. Spread the word
TheAsianSensation
MVCfans.com
MVCfans.com
 
Posts: 1175
Joined: April 6th, 2012, 7:23 am

Next

Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests


cron