So...wgslaw wrote:I think I see things quite a bit differently than most of the Board. I see NI as a very well coached team with a scheme that maximizes its players' talents offensively and plays solid defense. It has several excellent open perimeter shooters. The key is Tuttle who is very difficult to defend by anyone his own size and, unlike many players inside, if you help on him he gets the ball to the open three point or cutting shooter. I also see NI as a little limited athletically, cain't create their own three point shot, and cain't ratchet it up to a new level defensively. I think they would do well against a team like KU but not Utah or other teams with a relatively athletic 7 footer who can shut Tuttle down. I see WSU as more of a work in process but with a significantly higher upside. That should not be a surprise as most of their inside bigs are young and inconsistent.
PantherSigEp wrote:Whoever wins the re-re-rematch in the national title game wins...
Cdizzle wrote:PantherSigEp wrote:Whoever wins the re-re-rematch in the national title game wins...
Unless that ties the series. In which case I'm pretty sure we just have to go back to my Dan Muller idea.
PantherSigEp wrote:I think it's fair to say that it's still fairly cloudy in regards to who truly has a leg up on the other and hopefully this weekend will be able to tell us more.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 74 guests