PantherSigEp wrote:Sometimes I miss CaseyGarrison4Prez
Here is my snappy comeback: Two thumbs up, way up!
PantherSigEp wrote:Sometimes I miss CaseyGarrison4Prez
Wufan wrote:BEARZ77 wrote:ShoxNAwe wrote:Yes, this isn't about ego. It's about improving your lot in life, like looking for a better job than the one you have. Who here would deny someone that right or ridicule someone for trying?
Maybe those who celebrate the day they were invited to join the MVC as one of the greatest days in the history of their University should stand down and let others test their limits and explore their own new heights.
Maybe a few WSU posters [not all] should go back and review comments made when Creighton explored and then acted on moving, or threads about other programs considering moves in order to step up in football. I agree that WSU should explore every possible avenue, timing is everything, and what better time for them. Just don't play both sides of the argument about how it's stupid and folly when other schools look for opportunities but something to be applauded when WSU does and if a negative opinion is floated, it's all about jealousy.
Again I think WSU should pursue any option they have the resources to make work, makes sense at this point and time.
But the MSU sealed envelope stuff was ridiculous. And looking for an invite to the Sunbelt? Those two things were over the top funny way beyond the legitimacy of the claims.
Ricardo del Rio wrote:PantherSigEp wrote:Sometimes I miss CaseyGarrison4Prez
Here is my snappy comeback: Two thumbs up, way up!
BEARZ77 wrote:Wufan wrote:
But the MSU sealed envelope stuff was ridiculous. And looking for an invite to the Sunbelt? Those two things were over the top funny way beyond the legitimacy of the claims.
That's just one instance; certainly the Creighton case was both credible and substantive, but you still see WSU posters ridicule their move. And while that particular case[ MSU/SunBelt] was the folly of a couple over zealous posters, the issue of MSU and other Valley Football programs looking to explore options has taken heat. My point is just that every school has every right and should explore any possibilities they see in their best interests and if you are going to comment about them, at least be consistent in your view. That doesn't mean all moves are equal, just that the process of exploring options is either one you support or one you don't.
MoValley John wrote:On the contrary, while Creighton fans were excited about the possibility, no Creighton fans claimed it was a done deal until... it was a done deal.
BEARZ77 wrote:MoValley John wrote:On the contrary, while Creighton fans were excited about the possibility, no Creighton fans claimed it was a done deal until... it was a done deal.
And yet they took heat and continue to take heat from some; which of course was the main point being made in contrast to WSU.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: chitown fanatic, Google Adsense [Bot] and 43 guests