What WSU needs to do to win the MVC

[dgreenwell3]

LOL Sirshoxalot, I respect the hell out of you for complete and utter honesty!That's hillarious ness and what happened to the Aggie! lol I knew that should be taken down...

[Khan4Cats]

I would say that the shoxs depth is part of their problem rotating so many guys into the fold has developed into almost no team chemistry. They play the game as individuals but lose as a team.

What are you talking about? It not like WSU is 11-8 with Mid 80's RPI, they are 15-4 with 44 RPI. Yeah, WSU has lost a couple close games at home, but it is not like their has been the collapse like the pre-season favorite had last year.

You don't go 4-0 on the road in the MVC winning by double digits with no team chemistry. You don't win a 3-OT with no team chemistry.

Um, what? The pre-season favorites last year went 15-3 in the Conference, 25-4 overall and ran away with the league. Interesting defintion of collapse.

As for the Shocks, they still control their destiny. It means winning on the road to make up for the two home losses-but they still have that chance and don't need "help" from anyone if they win out.

[Snaggletooth]

I would say that the shoxs depth is part of their problem rotating so many guys into the fold has developed into almost no team chemistry. They play the game as individuals but lose as a team.

What are you talking about? It not like WSU is 11-8 with Mid 80's RPI, they are 15-4 with 44 RPI. Yeah, WSU has lost a couple close games at home, but it is not like their has been the collapse like the pre-season favorite had last year.

You don't go 4-0 on the road in the MVC winning by double digits with no team chemistry. You don't win a 3-OT with no team chemistry.

Um, what? The pre-season favorites last year went 15-3 in the Conference, 25-4 overall and ran away with the league. Interesting defintion of collapse.

As for the Shocks, they still control their destiny. It means winning on the road to make up for the two home losses-but they still have that chance and don't need "help" from anyone if they win out.

I know in your mind it is always about UNI, but the preseason favorite was Creighton that I was talking about from last year. They started out the season as the topped rank MVC team in the polls and with the highest expectations until they lose 3 of their first 5 and quickly became irrelevant.

[SirShoxAlot]

LOL Sirshoxalot, I respect the hell out of you for complete and utter honesty!That's hillarious ness and what happened to the Aggie! lol I knew that should be taken down...

Not sure what the second half of this means, but thanks!

[Khan4Cats]

What are you talking about? It not like WSU is 11-8 with Mid 80's RPI, they are 15-4 with 44 RPI. Yeah, WSU has lost a couple close games at home, but it is not like their has been the collapse like the pre-season favorite had last year.

You don't go 4-0 on the road in the MVC winning by double digits with no team chemistry. You don't win a 3-OT with no team chemistry.

Um, what? The pre-season favorites last year went 15-3 in the Conference, 25-4 overall and ran away with the league. Interesting defintion of collapse.

As for the Shocks, they still control their destiny. It means winning on the road to make up for the two home losses-but they still have that chance and don't need "help" from anyone if they win out.

I know in your mind it is always about UNI, but the preseason favorite was Creighton that I was talking about from last year. They started out the season as the topped rank MVC team in the polls and with the highest expectations until they lose 3 of their first 5 and quickly became irrelevant.

I realize you have an un-ending obsession with Creighton but UNI was the OVERWHELMING pre-season favorite last year. UNI received 38 of the 39 1st place votes last year in the pre-season poll. Pretty sure that makes them clear-cut favorites. You may have been talking about TWO years ago, but for last year, you are most definitely wrong. Saying Creighton was the pre-season favorite last year would be like saying Missouri State was the pre-season favorite this year with the 'highest expectations.'

http://www.mvc-sports.com/ViewArticle.d ... =204821437

Go ahead, show the poll that made Creighton the clear-cut favorites last year.

[dgreenwell3]

there was an erotic photo of a Texas a&m Aggie to respond to my comment lol

[unipanther99]

I know in your mind it is always about UNI, but the preseason favorite was Creighton that I was talking about from last year. They started out the season as the topped rank MVC team in the polls and with the highest expectations until they lose 3 of their first 5 and quickly became irrelevant.

UNI had all but one vote in the preseason poll last year: http://www.mvc-sports.com/ViewArticle.d ... =204821437

The Panthers are a near unanimous pick to win this year, receiving 38 of 39 first-place votes in a poll conducted by league coaches, media, and sports information directors. UNI earned 389 out of a possible 390 points and outdistanced Creighton, which received the remaining first-place tally and 336 total points.

The Panthers - also picked to win by The Sporting News College Basketball Preview, Lindy's College Basketball Preview, and Athlon Sports College Basketball Preview -

[Snaggletooth]

Go ahead, show the poll that made Creighton the clear-cut favorites last year.

Please, do you really care what the different media members from the MVC are predicting? What is their accuracy? Not very good and their logic is usually questionable.

The pre-season national perception in the coaches poll expected CU to be the best team in the MVC. ESPN Coaches Preseason Coaches Poll had CU was ranked 45th and UNI was 54th.

[MSUDuo]

Go ahead, show the poll that made Creighton the clear-cut favorites last year.

Please, do you really care what the different media members from the MVC are predicting? What is their accuracy? Not very good and their logic is usually questionable.

The pre-season national perception in the coaches poll expected CU to be the best team in the MVC. ESPN Coaches Preseason Coaches Poll had CU was ranked 45th and UNI was 54th.

Yeah, because no one knows that Valley better than ESPN

[Snaggletooth]

Go ahead, show the poll that made Creighton the clear-cut favorites last year.

Please, do you really care what the different media members from the MVC are predicting? What is their accuracy? Not very good and their logic is usually questionable.

The pre-season national perception in the coaches poll expected CU to be the best team in the MVC. ESPN Coaches Preseason Coaches Poll had CU was ranked 45th and UNI was 54th.

Yeah, because no one knows that Valley better than ESPN

Please tell me you don't you really think that ESPN is the one that really votes in the ESPN Coaches poll.