VUGrad1314 wrote:Aces44 wrote:VUGrad1314 wrote:This is a really solid get for Bradley. If the other games are of similar caliber then they can build a really solid schedule. Illinois State's schedule on the other hand is not very exciting but that's okay for year one as Pedon tries to rebuild the program in his image. He looks to be a strong hire so hopefully he will have the Redbirds at an at large caliber level very soon! A program that has struggled recently stepping up into the upper echelon would be very good for the league!
You literally just said in the other thread that you didn’t want a MAC-MVC series, but this is great in your opinion? LOL
Read my post in that thread to understand why I said it was unnecessary to do a formal challenge. But to save you the trouble I'll restate it here: Akron is a solid get on the schedule because they are repeatedly at or near the top of the MAC standings so it's a good series that should contribute positively to Bradley's SOS and maybe even their overall resume if the Braves are ever good enough. But overall RE: a formal MVC-MAC challenge: MAC games are good gets for MVC teams but we are able to get them anyway without a formal challenge. We also should wait until realignment settles down to see what the new pecking order looks like before committing to a formal challenge. It may open previously unavailable opportunities for the MVC or make formerly attractive partners far less attractive when it's all said and done. Does that make sense? I can't put it any more clearly than that.
Right.
Having a formal challenge isn't good for the MVC.
That said - there are some good MAC teams worth playing. Akron, Toledo, Buffalo, and Kent State have been traditionally pretty strong.
No one needs to be playing the bottom feeders formally, however.