MSU to C-USA?!?!
Well, s***! That sucks.
well, you guys were decent in the MVFC, so you shouldn't have too much problem winning there.
seriously though, good luck.
You'll be missed.
harley93davidson wrote:Can everything not be a referendum on valpo's membership in the league please? Yes most of us, including myself, wanted murray in 2017 and I would not have been interested in adding them during the belmont, uic, murray round. I understand the frustration with valpo. However, from a personal POV, I graduated from Illinois state and I am a proud bird; but, I spent my first two years at Bradley. I left bradley because I joined a fraternity, drank too much and lost my scholarships (my ass was very studious at isu as a result). My love for the mvc runs very deep, beyond isu and making valpo fans feel unwelcome is beneath us. I imagine every valpo poster here was ecstatic to leave the horizon and join us. Valpo is an mvc member whether people like it or not, and they should be comfortable contributing here. I will get off my high horse and go birds!
Campbellproud wrote:harley93davidson wrote:Can everything not be a referendum on valpo's membership in the league please? Yes most of us, including myself, wanted murray in 2017 and I would not have been interested in adding them during the belmont, uic, murray round. I understand the frustration with valpo. However, from a personal POV, I graduated from Illinois state and I am a proud bird; but, I spent my first two years at Bradley. I left bradley because I joined a fraternity, drank too much and lost my scholarships (my ass was very studious at isu as a result). My love for the mvc runs very deep, beyond isu and making valpo fans feel unwelcome is beneath us. I imagine every valpo poster here was ecstatic to leave the horizon and join us. Valpo is an mvc member whether people like it or not, and they should be comfortable contributing here. I will get off my high horse and go birds!
I mean no shade to the Valpo fans. They are surely mortified. My shade is directed to the Valpo administration that sold the Valley a bill of goods. Some of that is on the league for lack of due diligence (for instance, they could add schools that already have everything in place instead of relying on promises). I was excited about the add when they joined, but have been severely disappointed since they joined. They joined in 2017 and here we are in 2024 and they are still boat anchors playing in a high school gym. Some posters have pointed to losing their coach before joining, but losing a coach shouldn’t collapse your whole program. And I get that they supposedly have a new arena in the works but that could take years, if it ever happens. It could be ten years since joining that they make good on their promise to have an MVC-level arena. Is that reasonable? I guess we’re stuck with them, and I’d love to see them thrive, but as a Valley fan I think I’m justified at feeling a little hood-winked. It’s not fair to their own fans either because they can’t be competitive in the Valley and should probably be in a low-major league to be competitive.
Campbellproud wrote:harley93davidson wrote:Can everything not be a referendum on valpo's membership in the league please? Yes most of us, including myself, wanted murray in 2017 and I would not have been interested in adding them during the belmont, uic, murray round. I understand the frustration with valpo. However, from a personal POV, I graduated from Illinois state and I am a proud bird; but, I spent my first two years at Bradley. I left bradley because I joined a fraternity, drank too much and lost my scholarships (my ass was very studious at isu as a result). My love for the mvc runs very deep, beyond isu and making valpo fans feel unwelcome is beneath us. I imagine every valpo poster here was ecstatic to leave the horizon and join us. Valpo is an mvc member whether people like it or not, and they should be comfortable contributing here. I will get off my high horse and go birds!
I mean no shade to the Valpo fans. They are surely mortified. My shade is directed to the Valpo administration that sold the Valley a bill of goods. Some of that is on the league for lack of due diligence (for instance, they could add schools that already have everything in place instead of relying on promises). I was excited about the add when they joined, but have been severely disappointed since they joined. They joined in 2017 and here we are in 2024 and they are still boat anchors playing in a high school gym. Some posters have pointed to losing their coach before joining, but losing a coach shouldn’t collapse your whole program. And I get that they supposedly have a new arena in the works but that could take years, if it ever happens. It could be ten years since joining that they make good on their promise to have an MVC-level arena. Is that reasonable? I guess we’re stuck with them, and I’d love to see them thrive, but as a Valley fan I think I’m justified at feeling a little hood-winked. It’s not fair to their own fans either because they can’t be competitive in the Valley and should probably be in a low-major league to be competitive.
Drakey wrote:Campbellproud wrote:harley93davidson wrote:Can everything not be a referendum on valpo's membership in the league please? Yes most of us, including myself, wanted murray in 2017 and I would not have been interested in adding them during the belmont, uic, murray round. I understand the frustration with valpo. However, from a personal POV, I graduated from Illinois state and I am a proud bird; but, I spent my first two years at Bradley. I left bradley because I joined a fraternity, drank too much and lost my scholarships (my ass was very studious at isu as a result). My love for the mvc runs very deep, beyond isu and making valpo fans feel unwelcome is beneath us. I imagine every valpo poster here was ecstatic to leave the horizon and join us. Valpo is an mvc member whether people like it or not, and they should be comfortable contributing here. I will get off my high horse and go birds!
I mean no shade to the Valpo fans. They are surely mortified. My shade is directed to the Valpo administration that sold the Valley a bill of goods. Some of that is on the league for lack of due diligence (for instance, they could add schools that already have everything in place instead of relying on promises). I was excited about the add when they joined, but have been severely disappointed since they joined. They joined in 2017 and here we are in 2024 and they are still boat anchors playing in a high school gym. Some posters have pointed to losing their coach before joining, but losing a coach shouldn’t collapse your whole program. And I get that they supposedly have a new arena in the works but that could take years, if it ever happens. It could be ten years since joining that they make good on their promise to have an MVC-level arena. Is that reasonable? I guess we’re stuck with them, and I’d love to see them thrive, but as a Valley fan I think I’m justified at feeling a little hood-winked. It’s not fair to their own fans either because they can’t be competitive in the Valley and should probably be in a low-major league to be competitive.
This booting Valpo talk is nonsense. It wasn't that many years ago people on this board were advocating that Drake be kicked out of the conference. You just kick out whichever school is on a rough streak?
jsaluki080 wrote:MSU to C-USA?!?!
Well, s***! That sucks.
well, you guys were decent in the MVFC, so you shouldn't have too much problem winning there.
seriously though, good luck.
You'll be missed.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 149 guests