IllinoisState wrote:unipanther99 wrote:Given our geographical shift to the east over the years, some sort of agreement with the MAC wouldn't be the worst thing in the world. Not great games, but decent schedule fillers for those MVC teams who are really struggling to fill out their schedule. And travel wouldn't be terrible.
It's not a great basketball conference, but those are all "name schools" casual fans have heard of, and makes the schedule sound more normal than some of the more far-flung obscure D-1 teams we sometimes end up with.
Last season the MVC played 11 games against the MAC. We don't need an agreement with them. We also don't need to have a scheduling agreement with the Horizon, Summit, or OVC for the same reason.
We could use simple official guidelines. Didn't we used to do something like this? No scheduling teams with a net of 300 or worse in the two years prior to you scheduling them. Only 2 games with a net of 250 or higher in the past two years from when you've scheduled them.
Yes, there was scheduling criteria in the early 2000s, complete with financial penalties for failing to meet the criteria. BUT...the coaches and AD cried about it, despite the success it yielded in the form of multiple bids and decent seeding, culminating in 4 bids in 2006, and it was removed sometime around 04-05, IIRC.
To be fair, it's a completely different landscape now and I'm not sure it could/would have the same impact at this point.