harley93davidson wrote:I'm against Toledo, but I could at least be talked into coming around to them. Why exactly would we add niu? Even if I conceded Toledo was a good idea, I would reject both over accepting both if that was the offer. This would be mind numbingly bad.
BCPanther wrote:harley93davidson wrote:I'm against Toledo, but I could at least be talked into coming around to them. Why exactly would we add niu? Even if I conceded Toledo was a good idea, I would reject both over accepting both if that was the offer. This would be mind numbingly bad.
What makes you against Toledo? They have the exact profile that we'd be looking for in a 12th and a clear, clear upgrade over Missouri State.
VUGrad1314 wrote:One thing I would be concerned about is whether the substantial travel cost increase to Toledo football would harm their basketball program or if they would make this up in guarantee games in the nonconference? I can't imagine the media deal being any better for them than it is in the MAC with most of the best brands in the MWC gone. Also most of their games in all sports are bus trips so there's a not insignificant travel cost for Toledo in Olympic sports as well. They have the profile but do they have the financial strength to take all of this on and maintain it? NIU fits our footprint but is not a strong enough program. They kind of face the opposite problem of having to fly most places where a good portion of their Olympic trips would be bus trips. I'm still not sure if the league would benefit from adding them especially with the additional football expenses factored in. Tough call when we're involving FBS Schools in our league who will leave at the earliest opportunity for a better fit. I doubt this ends up happening though because MAC schools leaving for the MWC is just stupid on its face even for FB only.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 21 guests