Jays26 wrote:rlh04d wrote:Should it matter?
I mean, surely Creighton can replace four of their starters every year and still challenge for the Valley championship, right?
If WSU can do it, surely Creighton, the class of the Valley's history, should have no problem replacing just one little player.
Again...stop being a DB....you make an entire fan base look bad.
Jays26 wrote:Funniest load of Wichiturd crap I have read in a long time....thank you soooo much for the gut buster.
Also don't forget to snuggle close to your buddy cold tonight, going to be a long night in central Kansas.
How's the weather in Wichiturd? Heck, how's anything in Wichiturd?
Boy Wichiturd fans are touchy....
Gregggggggggg overcompensating for other short falls…….Just like a few Wichita fans.
Hey Wichiturd fan....time to let this thread die.....the fat Wichita lady has sung!
Vegas really doesn't respect the hicks do they.
....I bet half the 5th graders in Wichita have tats already.
Aargh wrote:
I was merely trying to point out the fallacy of telling a WSU not to be a DB, or the WSU fan base could get a bad reputation. That's like telling someone not to open the barn door or the cow might get out when there is no cow.
rlh04d wrote:Should it matter?
I mean, surely Creighton can replace four of their starters every year and still challenge for the Valley championship, right?
bluejays89 wrote:Some Wichita fans seem to be fairly insecure: http://shockernet.net/forum/showthread. ... ate-Thread
We should stop being so mean
blueblood wrote:Then if you start reading the MVC boards wow what a difference. They really hate CU. sCUm is the common name. We did not win the game, they lost it. UNI was probably the one that surprised me the most. Worse than WSU's board. Lot of hate out there.
CUJay wrote:Creighton has never been in the play-in game in St. Louis.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 117 guests